Does Acupuncture Work? Placebo, Nocebo, & The Power of Perception

Exploring the Power of Perception: Understanding the Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Acupuncture

In the realm of alternative medicine, the mind-body connection plays a pivotal role in shaping our experiences of health and wellness. Central to this interplay are the placebo and nocebo effects, phenomena that underscore the profound influence of perception on our physiological responses. As we delve into the world of acupuncture, it becomes imperative to understand the distinction between these two effects and their implications for the effectiveness of acupuncture treatments.

Understanding the Placebo and Nocebo Effects

The placebo effect refers to the phenomenon wherein a patient experiences a positive therapeutic outcome solely due to their belief in the efficacy of a treatment, regardless of its actual physiological impact. Conversely, the nocebo effect occurs when negative expectations or beliefs lead to adverse outcomes or side effects, even in the absence of any active treatment.

Here are some research studies that shed light on the placebo effect and its influence on acupuncture, as well as measured physiological responses to acupuncture in comparison with conventional medical treatments:

1. Vickers et al. (2012): In this study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, researchers conducted a meta-analysis of acupuncture trials involving chronic pain. They compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture and standard care alone. The results indicated that acupuncture was significantly more effective than sham acupuncture for treating chronic pain, suggesting that acupuncture's effects extend beyond placebo. However, the difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture was modest, indicating that placebo effects may still contribute to acupuncture's efficacy.

2. Linde et al. (2010): This meta-analysis, published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, examined the efficacy of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis. The researchers compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture and found a small but statistically significant difference favoring acupuncture over sham acupuncture. While the authors acknowledged the potential role of placebo effects, they concluded that acupuncture appears to be more than just a placebo for migraine prevention.

3. Yuzhu et al. (2024): In this study titled "Acupuncture-related Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Review", the review examines various aspects of acupuncture treatment for knee OA, including its mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and comparison with conventional treatments. The authors discuss the physiological mechanisms through which acupuncture exerts its therapeutic effects in knee OA, such as modulating inflammatory mediators, promoting tissue repair, and modulating pain perception through the central nervous system. The review evaluates the clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of acupuncture for knee OA based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews. It highlights findings indicating that acupuncture can provide significant pain relief, improve physical function, and enhance quality of life in patients with knee OA. Further, the review compares the effectiveness of acupuncture with conventional treatments for knee OA, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroid injections, and physical therapy. It highlights studies suggesting that acupuncture may offer comparable or superior outcomes to conventional treatments, with fewer side effects and a more favorable risk-benefit profile. Overall, the review provides valuable insights into the role of acupuncture-related therapy as a viable treatment option for knee osteoarthritis, offering clinicians and patients a deeper understanding of its potential mechanisms of action with clear objective measurements and comparisons with conventional treatments.

These studies provide valuable insights into the complex interplay between acupuncture, placebo effects, and therapeutic outcomes. While acupuncture's efficacy appears to extend beyond placebo effects in many cases, the precise mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects remain a topic of ongoing research and debate.

The Role of Belief in Acupuncture

In the context of acupuncture, skepticism often arises regarding its efficacy, with some attributing its effects solely to the placebo response. However, proponents of acupuncture argue that its benefits extend beyond mere belief, rooted in the intricate interplay of neurophysiological mechanisms and the body's innate healing capacities.

Acupuncture works by stimulating specific points on the body, known as acupuncture points or acupoints, to regulate the flow of Qi (pronounced "chee"), or vital energy, along meridians or pathways. While the concept of Qi may seem abstract from a Western perspective, modern research has elucidated the physiological mechanisms underlying acupuncture's effects, including the release of endogenous opioids, modulation of neurotransmitters, and regulation of inflammatory pathways.

Contrary to the notion that acupuncture's efficacy hinges solely on belief, studies have shown that acupuncture can elicit measurable physiological changes, such as increased blood flow, reduced inflammation, and altered brain activity, irrespective of the patient's beliefs or expectations. This suggests that acupuncture exerts tangible effects on the body's regulatory systems, independent of psychological factors alone.

The Healer & The Healed

Dr. Ted Kaptchuk, a renowned expert in the field of placebo studies and author of “The Web That Has No Weaver: Understanding Chinese Medicine” , practiced acupuncture for over half his adult life. However, he stopped giving the treatment due to powerful encounters he had with patients that made him reconsider - is it the acupuncture that creates sudden healing miracles? Or is it the connection to the healer? …

Dr. Kaptchuk performed a study whereby patients were openly told they were given placebo, however, one group was informed that there were numerous studies indicating “the power and efficacy of the placebo effect”, whereas the other group was simply given the placebo and told it was a placebo, with no additional information. “Patients who received the openly distributed placebo scored far better on standard assessments of their condition than those who received nothing. There were also statistically significant differences in the severity of symptoms. Although a group of eighty patients is too small to draw definitive conclusions, honesty seemed to work” (Specter, 2011). While this is just one of numerous examples, what Dr. Kaptchuk continues to be a proponent of this the mere fact that the mind seem capable of playing a role in healing at all, even if the mechanism is unknown.

Dr. Kaptchuck was interviewed by The New Yorker in 2011. In this interview, author Michael Specter summarized one of the first studies to show a proposed mechanism for the placebo effect:

“In 1978, three scientists from the University of California at San Francisco—Jon Levine, Newton Gordon, and Howard Fields—decided to investigate whether endorphins might explain why patients who received placebos often reported a significant reduction in pain. People recovering from dental surgery were told that they were about to receive a dose of morphine, saline, or a drug that might increase their pain. By then, researchers had learned not only about the nocebo effect but that a suggestion of relief will often trigger the production of endorphins, so they were not surprised that patients receiving saline reported reduced pain.“

According to Kaptchuk, this was a groundbreaking study. It points out that it is the mere fact that the mind is able to exert any mechanism at all that makes the placebo effect powerful, rather than null. In this same interview, he further elaborates on his experience of the powerful role that healer-to-patient connection can shape the therapeutic response, challenging conventional notions of efficacy based solely on pharmacological mechanisms or belief alone.

So, is it the physiological effects of acupuncture that creates the healing? Is it the mind? Is it the connection of the healer and the patient? Is it the healer’s ability to remain at a “zero point”, or non-judgemental presence, allowing for the patient’s mind to take on a new pattern of thinking, and thus feeling, and thus biochemical change?

An Anecdote

At the beginning of my doctoral studies in acupuncture, I was dating a man who was in a physics graduate program. One of his classmates was a lovely woman from China. When I told her I was studying Chinese Medicine, she remarked to me, “Many people in modern China no longer believe in certain forms of alternative medicine. One master healer told me, ‘Some people’s minds are so strong that the simple treatments no longer have an effect; their mind is stronger than the technique’.” And yet, she herself still received acupuncture for health and wellness. She was a very intelligent woman with a powerful mind (as many physicists tend to have!) - yet she was open to receive a treatment that she believed could be “blocked” from working in the minds of some. I was so intrigued by her story. It stays with me to this day as I realize that the space that I create as a healer is simply that - a space. I have my intention, and the patient has their’s. What happens from there? Ideally, an opportunity to educate, grow, heal, and blossom in the space that we’ve created together.

Conclusion

In the intricate tapestry of healing, the placebo and nocebo effects serve as poignant reminders of the profound influence of perception on our health outcomes. While these phenomena underscore the importance of belief and expectation in shaping our experiences of treatment, they do not diminish the legitimacy or efficacy of acupuncture as a therapeutic modality. Grounded in ancient wisdom and supported by modern research, acupuncture appears to offers a multifaceted approach to healing that transcends the boundaries of belief, tapping into the body's innate capacity for self-regulation and restoration. And yet we must ask ourselves - is acupuncture simply a ritual through which the mind can suspend or assume a belief, by which self-healing can occur? Or is it the healer themselves who allows for this space of transcendence and transformation?

As we continue to unravel the mysteries of mind-body medicine, acupuncture stands as a testament to the enduring power of holistic healing in our quest for optimal health and well-being.

Book here to experience acupuncture with Dr. Sinéad, LAc, DACM